Home Green Technology Ballot: Rolling again local weather motion a attainable deal-breaker for a lot of potential Conservative voters

Ballot: Rolling again local weather motion a attainable deal-breaker for a lot of potential Conservative voters

Ballot: Rolling again local weather motion a attainable deal-breaker for a lot of potential Conservative voters


VANCOUVER – Much more Canadians say they might extra seemingly forged their ballots for a Conservative Occasion that retains in place Canada’s local weather measures than one which rolls them again, based on a brand new ballot carried out by Abacus Knowledge for Clear Power Canada.

A dedication to at the least sustaining Canada’s present local weather and clear power ambitions is extra common than the other strategy with respondents from each single province, age group, and gender. Additionally it is extra common with supporters from each political occasion—together with, by a small margin, Conservative voters.

In whole, 42% of Canadians say they might be extra more likely to vote for a pro-climate Conservative Occasion in comparison with 13% who could be much less seemingly. In distinction, an anti-climate Conservative Occasion would deter extra voters than it might entice—together with 16% of present Conservative voters.

In the case of prices and clear power options, a majority of Canadians (63%) accurately acknowledge that choosing an electrical car and a warmth pump is cheaper than selecting fossil-fuel-powered options. This proportion is particularly excessive in Quebec—a province with above-average EV adoption. 

When requested which sorts of energy era they assist, Canadians overwhelmingly want energy from clear power sources. Majorities say they assist photo voltaic (74%), wind (67%), and hydropower (67%) in comparison with simply 46% who assist pure fuel and 18% who assist coal (when known as “fossil fuel,” one other time period for pure fuel, assist drops to 25%).

Concerning who’s chargeable for making the power transition occur, Canadians overwhelmingly consider that federal and provincial governments are each accountable, with 90% of Canadians seeing the federal authorities as very or considerably accountable in comparison with 89% on the provincial stage. It’s a view held kind of persistently throughout age and site. Canadians additionally see a transparent function for municipal governments, with 84% believing they bear accountability.

Lastly, 90% of Canadians assume the clear power sector is vital to the Canadian economic system, with half of that group describing it as essential. What’s extra, 84% of Albertans see the clear power sector as vital, regardless of an ongoing moratorium on new clear power developments.  


“For those who’re the Conservatives these outcomes, there’s each threat and reward. 

On the one hand, they might seemingly acquire assist and solidify present assist if they will persuade individuals they are going to be as bold as the present authorities of their local weather agenda.

Then again, there’s additionally threat in these numbers. They might lose as much as 16% of their present assist if these supporters really feel their local weather plan is inadequate or roll again what is going on now. That could possibly be the distinction between a majority and minority authorities and the distinction between with the ability to govern and never.” 

—David Coletto, Chair and CEO, Abacus Knowledge

“Local weather change and the affordability disaster are two political mountains that, removed from being at odds, have to be climbed collectively. A wealth of analysis reveals that the clear power transition will end in decrease power payments for Canadians, whereas real-world examples have confirmed that conservatives may be—and certainly profit from being—local weather champions.”

—Trevor Melanson, Communications Director, Clear Power Canada


The survey was carried out with 2,200 Canadian adults from October 27 to November 1, 2023. A random pattern of panelists have been invited to finish the survey from a set of accomplice panels based mostly on the Lucid alternate platform. These companions are sometimes double opt-in survey panels, blended to handle out potential skews within the knowledge from a single supply. The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random pattern of the identical dimension is +/- 2.1%, 19 instances out of 20. The info have been weighted based on census knowledge to make sure that the pattern matched Canada’s inhabitants based on age, gender, instructional attainment, and area. Totals could not add as much as 100 resulting from rounding.


Slide deck | Full outcomes



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here